TO HAVE AND HAVE NOT (1944) – Lauren Bacall’s sizzling movie debut


The following is my contribution to The Lauren Bacall Blogathon, being hosted Sept. 14-16, 2015 by the blog In the Good Old Days of Classic Hollywood. Click on the above banner, and read a variety of blogs devoted to the movies and career of this amazing actress!


Has there ever been a movie from the Big Studio System that got more mileage out of its star power than To Have and Have Not?

All of the movie’s other, more ballyhooed elements are famous mostly because they’re so derivative. The movie is based on an Ernest Hemingway novel, but the book was widely acknowledged as one of Hemingway’s worst (even by Hemingway), and in any case, Jules Furthman and William Faulkner’s screenplay uses as little of its original source as possible.

And I’m hardly the first person to note that the movie is a rough carbon copy of Casablanca, with most of its plot elements — most notably, a neutral bystander (Humphrey Bogart again) who ends up helping a romantic duo who are working against the Nazis.

But then, there’s…Lauren Bacall.


She plays “Slim,” an American who has just entered the pro-Germany French island of Martinique, where Harry/”Steve” (Bogart) runs his fishing boat. Slim picks the pocket of one of Steve’s associates — not a trait that you’d think would endear to anyone — and Steve catches her and calls her out on it. Yet Steve’s intrigued by her to play a game of cat-and-mouse with her for the rest of the night, as each one enters the other’s hotel room on the pretense of “returning” a bottle of hootch.


Why does Steve find Slim so intriguing? I suppose because she’s Lauren Bacall, who can make the act of asking for a match sound dirty. This was her film debut, after director Howard Hawks’ wife came across Bacall as a 19-year-old model on the cover of Harper’s Bazaar.

(Why does this woman suddenly accept the nickname Slim? And why does she, in turn, call Harry “Steve” out of nowhere? Because Steve and Slim are the nicknames that Hawks and his wife called each other. This is, believe me, just one of the many dialogue elements that the movie never even tries to explain.)

Once Bogart and Bacall start smoldering with screen chemistry, you find yourself willing to forgive a lot of things in this movie, such as Walter Brennan popping up every five minutes to do his lovable-alcoholic routine, and seeing Steve sass some Gestapo agents in a manner that probably would have gotten him filled with bullets in real life.

And I won’t completely give away the movie’s ending…but (SOMEWHAT-SPOILER ALERT) seeing Lauren Bacall vigorously shake her hips in the final scene makes up for a plethora of bad movies I’ve endured.

12 responses to “TO HAVE AND HAVE NOT (1944) – Lauren Bacall’s sizzling movie debut

  1. Great choice! It’s so hard to believe that this was Bacall’s movie debut. I always loved this performance, and I found a whole lot of appreciation for it after reading her autobiography where she confessed how nervous and freaked out she was. And then there’s the fact that you can see her and Bogie falling for each other… The two of them just take this movie to a whole other level. If it weren’t for Bacall, would this film be as well-known as it is now? Probably not.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I agree that Bacall is a big part of what makes this film worth watching (though Bogie does his share and the fact that it’s a Casablanca knock-off isn’t necessarily a bad thing 🙂 ). I also think Dolores Moran gave a nice if brief performance.


    Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: THE LAUREN BACALL BLOGATHON HAS NOW ARRIVED | In The Good Old Days Of Classic Hollywood.

  4. “Why does Steve find Slim so intriguing? I suppose because she’s Lauren Bacall, who can make the act of asking for a match sound dirty.” Very good. You capture a lot of what makes the movie fun despite all the inconsistencies and weird stuff going on. Was you ever stung by a dead bee?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I get a kick out of seeing this first pairing of such a legendary couple, but have never been able to take this movie to my heart. I don’t even like the ripped off, parred down episode of “Cheyenne” it inspired. I’ll also pass on “The Gun Runners”, although, I do like “The Breaking Point” – but I suppose there are exceptions to everything.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Was interested to read your take on this classic! Agree that Warner Bros really lucked out with the star mileage on this one – the only film that I think had anything near the same success (and this isn’t based on box office figures or anything) is Cleopatra – surely everyone went to see the ‘moment’ when Dick and Liz fell in love?

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Great review! Stoping a pickpocket is a weird way to start a love affair, isn’t it? And I agree that Lauren’s presence is what makes this film most remarkable: she is just so magnetic as Slim.
    Don’t forget to read my contribution to the blogathon! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Pingback: THE LAUREN BACALL BLOGATHON: A BIG THANK YOU TO ALL PARTICIPANTS | In The Good Old Days Of Classic Hollywood.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s